Jonathan Cohn of The New Republic, in a post entitled “Obama (and Cohn) Wrong on Berwick,” appears to have been persuaded by Tevi Troy’s argument that Berwick would have benefited from a full hearing:
Several of my readers, particularly conservative ones, wrote back to say they disagreed. Among them was Tevi Troy, a former deputy secretary at HHS who is now a visiting senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. I always take Tevi’s arguments seriously and advise readers to do the same.Cohn goes on to cite Troy’s correspondence:
I am also not averse to recess appointments in cases where the Senate is clearly dragging its feet or tripping someone up via rotating anonymous holds. In this case, however, I think the White House was unfair to both Berwick and CMS by recess appointing him before he could have a hearing.There is another reason for thoughtful (and philosophically consistent) liberals to oppose Berwick’s recess appointment: There won’t always be a Democrat in the White House.
Being a confirmed appointee really makes a difference at the agencies, and it is worth taking some political hits to give your nominees that important blessing.
UPDATE: Ezra Klein disagrees.
No comments:
Post a Comment